Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Duizenden gevangenen in de VS psychotisch door isoleercel


Dit verhaal komt onder dankzegging via The Christian Radical van wie de illustratie ook afkomstig is.
Opmerkelijk dat de Rote Armee Fraktion in feite de aanleiding gaf tot de eerste protesten tegen de isoleercel in Nederland.
Op uw impertinente vraag hoe ik dit weet kan ik zonder terughoudenheid antwoorden: ik was bij die acties. Het stemt treurig dat het niettemin allemaal erdoorgerost is, in Nederland en elders - en vooral in het paradijs van de opsluitindustrie, de VS.

- Sherwood Ross -


The United States today is housing tens of thousands of inmates in long-term solitary confinement, a form of numbing mental torture that drives about one-third of them psychotic, induces irrational anger in 90 percent, and ups the likelihood they will commit violent crimes upon release.

“It’s an awful thing, solitary,” U.S. Senator John McCain once wrote of his two years spent in a fifteen by fifteen foot prison cell in Viet Nam. “It crushes your spirit and weakens your resistance more effectively than any other form of mistreatment.” Testimony from other notables that have endured long stretches in solitary have elicited like comments.

Yet, the U.S. today has the dubious distinction of incarcerating “the vast majority of prisoners who are in long-term solitary confinement” around the world, according to an article in the March 30th The New Yorker magazine.

And they make up a growing portion of our 2.3 million inmates, a shameful statistic that ranks America first among all nations. Gawande’s article is titled “Hellhole.”


The first supermax built anywhere was Sydney, Australia’s “Katingal” unit at Long Bay Correctional Centre in 1975. Dubbed the “electronic zoo,” it lasted a brief two years before it was closed down over human rights concerns, according to Wikipedia.

In the 17 years beginning with the construction of the first U.S. “supermax” prison in Marion, Ill., in 1983, 60 such prisons have sprouted---prisons specifically designed for mass solitary confinement, reports Atul Gawande in the The New Yorker. The Federal Bureau of Prisons euphemistically refers to its solitary cells as “Special Housing Units.” Most of the supermax prisons have been erected by State governments and two-thirds of all states have them.

“The number of prisoners in these facilities has since risen to extraordinary levels,” Gawande writes. “America now holds at least 25,000 inmates in isolation in supermax facilities. An additional 50,000 to 80,000 are kept in restrictive segregation units, many of them in isolation, too, although the government does not release these figures.”

The Urban Institute found the per cell cost for confining one prisoner in solitary for one year is $75,000. Taxpayers could put a dozen students through community college for the same bucks and society would get a better return. From every indication, money spent on a supermax is money poorly spent.

Boston psychiatrist Stuart Grassian, who interviewed more than 200 prisoners kept in solitary, concluded that about one in three of them had developed acute psychosis with hallucinations. Prisoners so confined spend their time talking to themselves, pacing back and forth like animals in cages, and blank out mentally.

Some beat their heads against the walls until blood flows. Others lapse into catatonic states, utterly destroyed as functioning human beings. “EEG studies going back to the nineteen-sixties have shown diffuse slowing of brain waves in prisoners after a week or more of solitary confinement,” Gawande writes.

Often, prisoners can be confined in solitary for minor infractions of prison rules, such as taking too much time in the shower or associating with a gang member. By denying an inmate social interaction, “the human brain may become as impaired as one that has incurred a traumatic injury,” Gawande points out. After all, he notes, “Human beings are social creatures.”

The writer quotes Craig Haney, a psychology professor at the University of California at Santa Cruz allowed to study inmates at California’s Pelican Bay supermax, as finding many prisoners “begin to lose the ability to initiate behavior of any kind---to organize their own lives around activity and purpose. Chronic apathy, lethargy, depression, and despair often result.”

Additionally, many of the solitary inmates become consumed with revenge fantasies. We need to ask, “What is the cost to society in treasure and blood after their release?” “How many go straight to mental hospitals?” “How many wind up right back in prison?”

There are defenders of the supermax model, however. One inmate wrote the Denver Post he was not affected by the boredom and considered the silence “wonderful.” He said, “I still have a relatively intact mind. It could be infinitely worse.” And in Forbes magazine, author Ian Ross (no kin), wrote, “It’s worth considering that the Supermax model--which includes prisoner isolation for 23 out of every 24 hours a day--may be serving as a deterrent to some violent criminals, a kind of brightly lit billboard that advertises the life of rather extreme measures they are facing. There’s no way to quantify that, but it’s not out of the realm of possibility.” (It may be, indeed!)

In June, 2006, after a year-long study, the Commission on Safety and Abuse in America’s Prisons called for an end to long-term isolation of prisoners. It said there were no benefits to the practice beyond 10 days of punishment. What’s more, Gawande writes, “evidence from a number of studies has shown that supermax conditions---in which prisoners have virtually no social interactions and are given no programmatic support---make it highly likely that they will commit more crimes when they are released.”

The writer says our willingness to confine our own citizens to solitary made it easy to discard the Geneva Conventions prohibiting similar treatment of foreign prisoners of war. “In much the same way that a previous generation of Americans countenanced legalized segregation, ours has countenanced legalized torture. And there is no clearer manifestation of this than our routine use of solitary confinement---on our own people….”

Since prolonged solitary is little more than the sadistic crucifixion of thousands of human beings, where, oh where, is the public outrage?

Saturday, March 07, 2009

De charlatannerie van Peter R. de Vries


Een brief van onze vriend Harry Bout, de langstzittende gevangene van Nederland, en dan nog zittend voor iets wat hij niet gedaan heeft ook.
HIj wil dat we "iets doen" aan het bedrog van zelfbenoemde rechercheur Peter R. de Vries. Dit lijkt mij geen goed uitgangspunt.
Naar leven en welzijn zullen we zijn zaak weer opnemen binnenkort.



Harry Bout #180741
Ionia Maximum Correctional
1576 W. Bluewater Highway
Ionia, Michigan 48846-8594
U.S.A

Dear ...,
January 31st,2009

Just a short letter to let you know that I did listen to the Peter R. de Vries program over the phone even though I could not see it. It was 100% against me and they mistranslated into Dutch what my 1985 trial lawyer (Mr. Beason) said in English, from "I got a guilty" (as in verdict) to "hij IS schuldig" he IS guilty. This was clearly a deliberate mistranslation. Then Peter R. de Vries ridiculed the other Dutch media for giving my case attention without knowing the facts, as if the supportgroup does not know the facts, to discourage the other media from giving my case any further attention and in this way make sure the facts he withheld would never be told by the other media. Peter R. de Vries relied on his reputation as an investigative crime reporter to create the false appearance that he thoroughly looked into the facts of my case to justify his conclusion while discrediting the supportgroup as not knowing the facts, facts 1ike these:

1. What Elvin Shaver said in his affidavits that prosecutor and detectives forced him to lie; Elvin being taken off the witness stand by the detectives while giving his testimony (witness tampering) because he was going to tell the court that he was being forced to lie;

2. Cecil McKinney (the one time pimp of Dawn Bean) confessing that he gave Dawn the murder weapon; That Dawn confessed to him that she committed the murder and bragged about it;

3. Dawn' s probation officer (Kim Hage) who knew of Dawn´s background as a street prostitute who was known to carry a gun and switchblade knife was never interviewed;

4. The false diagram of the crime scene and the false police testimony to falsely discredit the testimony of the only eyewitness not involved in the crime (Evelyn Schnieder);

5. The false testimony by attorney Richard Holst about his involvement with the writing and smuggling of letters to Dawn; The false testimony by Holst that he never provided me with the police report of Iwuagwu attacking a city housing inspector with a knife and being on probation for it; the false testimony by Holst that ne never gave me the criminal jury instructions for the defense he fabricated, all of which Holst later admitted to having done 7 years later in a Civil lawsuit;

6. That prosecutor Klavins & detective Roelofs driving all the way to the prison in the upper peninsula of Michigan to threaten Elvin Shaver and remove Elvin from the prison and personally bring him back to Grand Rapids for the court hearing where Elvin was scheduled to give testimony against Klavins and Roelofs, and then make Elvin plead the Fifth Amendment right of silence so he would not give testimony against them or else face life imprisonment;

7. That. Dawn from the very beginning tried to proceed with an insanity defense; That Dawn failed 2 lie detector tests, and on the 3rd test the results were inconclusive.

8. That I asked prosecutor Klavins for a lie detector test and that Klavins refused to let me have one.

9. Detective Roelofs being caught lying on the witness stand saying that Evelyn Schnieder never before the time of trial said that she seen me coming up the stairs even though the original police interview transcipt of Evelyn 4 months earlier clearly shows that she told the police this the very same day I was arrested April 5th, 1985.

10. That attorney James Lawrence who discovered the evidence proving that the diagram was false and that the police testimony was false, was never interviewed, and neither was my Dutch attorney G.G.J Knoops interviewed.