Een brief van onze vriend Harry Bout, de langstzittende gevangene van Nederland, en dan nog zittend voor iets wat hij niet gedaan heeft ook.
HIj wil dat we "iets doen" aan het bedrog van zelfbenoemde rechercheur Peter R. de Vries. Dit lijkt mij geen goed uitgangspunt.
Naar leven en welzijn zullen we zijn zaak weer opnemen binnenkort.
Harry Bout #180741
Ionia Maximum Correctional
1576 W. Bluewater Highway
Ionia, Michigan 48846-8594
U.S.A
Dear ...,
January 31st,2009
Just a short letter to let you know that I did listen to the Peter R. de Vries program over the phone even though I could not see it. It was 100% against me and they mistranslated into Dutch what my 1985 trial lawyer (Mr. Beason) said in English, from "I got a guilty" (as in verdict) to "hij IS schuldig" he IS guilty. This was clearly a deliberate mistranslation. Then Peter R. de Vries ridiculed the other Dutch media for giving my case attention without knowing the facts, as if the supportgroup does not know the facts, to discourage the other media from giving my case any further attention and in this way make sure the facts he withheld would never be told by the other media. Peter R. de Vries relied on his reputation as an investigative crime reporter to create the false appearance that he thoroughly looked into the facts of my case to justify his conclusion while discrediting the supportgroup as not knowing the facts, facts 1ike these:
1. What Elvin Shaver said in his affidavits that prosecutor and detectives forced him to lie; Elvin being taken off the witness stand by the detectives while giving his testimony (witness tampering) because he was going to tell the court that he was being forced to lie;
2. Cecil McKinney (the one time pimp of Dawn Bean) confessing that he gave Dawn the murder weapon; That Dawn confessed to him that she committed the murder and bragged about it;
3. Dawn' s probation officer (Kim Hage) who knew of Dawn´s background as a street prostitute who was known to carry a gun and switchblade knife was never interviewed;
4. The false diagram of the crime scene and the false police testimony to falsely discredit the testimony of the only eyewitness not involved in the crime (Evelyn Schnieder);
5. The false testimony by attorney Richard Holst about his involvement with the writing and smuggling of letters to Dawn; The false testimony by Holst that he never provided me with the police report of Iwuagwu attacking a city housing inspector with a knife and being on probation for it; the false testimony by Holst that ne never gave me the criminal jury instructions for the defense he fabricated, all of which Holst later admitted to having done 7 years later in a Civil lawsuit;
6. That prosecutor Klavins & detective Roelofs driving all the way to the prison in the upper peninsula of Michigan to threaten Elvin Shaver and remove Elvin from the prison and personally bring him back to Grand Rapids for the court hearing where Elvin was scheduled to give testimony against Klavins and Roelofs, and then make Elvin plead the Fifth Amendment right of silence so he would not give testimony against them or else face life imprisonment;
7. That. Dawn from the very beginning tried to proceed with an insanity defense; That Dawn failed 2 lie detector tests, and on the 3rd test the results were inconclusive.
8. That I asked prosecutor Klavins for a lie detector test and that Klavins refused to let me have one.
9. Detective Roelofs being caught lying on the witness stand saying that Evelyn Schnieder never before the time of trial said that she seen me coming up the stairs even though the original police interview transcipt of Evelyn 4 months earlier clearly shows that she told the police this the very same day I was arrested April 5th, 1985.
10. That attorney James Lawrence who discovered the evidence proving that the diagram was false and that the police testimony was false, was never interviewed, and neither was my Dutch attorney G.G.J Knoops interviewed.
